Click Button On or Off for music

This page last updated January 7, 1999 PST 13:13hrs
Web site maintenance and graphics by John Anthony Miller at Phantom Bookshop in Ventura, CA, USA
E-mail Sean Casteel UFO Journalist, Ventura, CA, USA


Sean Casteel UFO Journalist

The Internet's Original and First Web Site Dedicated Exclusively to UFO Journalism...

for January 7, 1999--

Whitley Strieber And The Toronto Experience

Whitley Strieber, the renowned abductee and author of the groundbreaking bestseller "Communion" (1987) and its sequels, "Transformation" (1988), "Breakthrough" (1995), "The Secret School" (1996), "The Communion Letters" (1997, which Strieber edited along with his wife Anne) and "Confirmation" (1998), manages to just keep those hits coming. In the story of his ongoing experiences with the Visitors and other strangers, a new chapter has been written that Strieber feels is the most important so far.

Sean is a UFO Journalist who has written major articles for many of the UFO magazines in the US and UK.


An interview with Whitley Strieber that features some material about his book "Confirmation: The Hard Evidence Of Aliens Among Us" (St. Martin's Press, 1998). While the new book was not to be released until May 26, as a journalist I was given an advance galley and conducted an interview with Strieber over the phone in which we discussed the new book as well as what life is like for the man who wrote "Communion" after more than ten years in the harsh glare of an unbelieving media.

You may also buy Whitley's books from this web site (our link is below).

Whitley Strieber's Reconstructed Web Site

Search for UFO, Alien and Related Topical Books From This Site

To find the current books on these subjects written by the researchers and authors interviewed by Sean Casteel on this web site, please click here to use Amazon's powerful search engine. Millions of book titles are available, and you will find that UFO book if it is in print or even out of print. Just enter word or name you are interested in and the books and comments from readers'will appear. The books are routed through Phantom Bookshop in Ventura, in association with Amazon.com

Sean Casteel regularly reviews books for magazine, so be sure to look there as well for book reviews on UFO/abduction/alien topics.

You may place an order to purchase your book. You may also read what other readers have said about some of the books listed and leave your comments as well.

Please help support this web site and the authors who have given so much of their lives in the quest for truth that are represented on this web site by purchasing their work. In that way you can encourage them, so that they know they have your support. Knowledge is Power...


Sean and Whitley in Thousand Oaks, CA
Sean Casteel, Whitley Strieber and friend in Thousand Oaks, California, USA Oct. 1997 at MUFON meeting, where Whitley was a guest speaker.

Questions and/or Comments? E-mail:Sean Casteel.

He's Back! Breaking Through with Whitley Strieber

By Sean Casteel

The best-selling horror writer whose works include The Hunger and The Wolfen, Whitley Strieber amazed the literary world with his first-hand encounters with other-worldly beings. Today, he remains one of the most controversial figures in literature; his book Communion, when released several years ago, remained on the best-seller lists for many weeks.

The author of the mega best-seller, Communion, has not been silenced as some had thought. This time Whitley says he has proof of his experiences.

After more than six years in a self-imposed exile from both the UFO community and the reading public in general, Whitley Strieber, author of the runaway bestsellers Communion(1987) and Transformation(1988), has again entered the UFO abduction fray with a new book on his more recent experiences at the hands of the mysterious Visitors called Breakthrough: The Next Step (Harper-Collins Publishers, 1995). Like Strieber's first two entries in the field, both of which remain hugely controversial even after the passage of several years Breathrough again displays Strieber's unique storytelling ability along with his own highly original interpretive skills in "understanding" the abduction phenomenon, and the results are a riveting and totally absorbing reading experience. We spoke to Whitley Strieber by phone recently about the new book and what follows is the testimony of one who has been there and back, and one who has much to tell us upon his return.


Question: What do you anticipate will be the public's reaction to Breakthrough?

Strieber: Breakthrough is really written for people who have had the encounter experience, and for people who are interested in it. Beyond that, I don't know what the public reaction will be, and it doesn't really matter very much to me either. I'm not really interested in convincing the general public that this is true. What I am interested in is reaching people who are involved in some way with the experience with information about it. Affirmation about the level of reality on which it exists. And strategies, however good or inept they may be, that I've evolved to deal with them.

Question: What do you think the UFO community's reaction will be? I don't mean the encounter public, but the UFO researchers' community.

Strieber: That's really not an answerable question, and it's too complicated. That community exists in so many different levels that it's really hard to know. I mean, the reaction to it will range from one of interest to one of rejection, obviously. I don't think there would be a consensus reaction on the part of the whole community. I'd be very surprised. That would be a first.

Question: Why did you feel compelled to go public again with new experiences after you had withdrawn from the subject back in 1989?

Strieber: Well, I withdrew in 1989 because I had gotten the proof, the thing I regarded as proof, and which would be proof certainly to anyone who's had anything remotely resembling those experiences. And I had noticed that not only Communion but really anything anybody does publicly involving this experience seems to bring it closer to people. And I just didn't feel like I wanted to necessarily do that until I had some clearer idea of what in the heck was going on. So, I tried to settle in my own mind the question, Could I at least deal with this in some way that was useful to me? That I would consider valuable? Because if I couldn't, then why bother? I don't really care very much about what the Visitors want or don't want to get out of it, or even why they're here. My interest and my focus is on what do I get out of it? What good is it for me? If it was nothing for me except a lot of scary experiences in the middle of the night, then frankly, the hell with it. But if I could make something valuable out of it, then it would be worth continuing. And I found that, for me, I did make something valuable out of it. And I wanted to communicate that that was possible because I began to see that it was a rare and useful experience, and one that I think that a lot of people would welcome in their lives as long as they had some means of handling it that resulted in their getting benefits from it.

Question: You talk a great deal about feelings of love and compassion being transmitted to you by the aliens and you even talk about an alien who jumps on your back and causes you to dream of your relationship with the Visitors as a kind of "marriage." That was a particularly interesting scene in the new book. Do you have anything new to say about that since Breakthrough has gone to press?

Strieber: The way I'd like to answer this question is sort of indirectly by saying the experience is incredibly complicated and not at all easily characterized in terms of black and white. For example, while I speak about those things in the book, I also speak about some of the hard stuff that's happened to me and to others. And I indeed quote some letters that describe horrific bullying on the part of the Visitors. I don't think the experience can be meaningfully addressed just in terms of it being a negative experience of being a positive experience. It's a lot of things. It's an experience of extraordinary complexity. That could either mean a maze you get lost in or something that's rich and full of meaning. I don't know in the long run which it will be, but right now, I think it's at least worth experimenting with as an experience.

Question: So, you don't feel like experimentation is a dangerous thing?

Strieber: Oh, I think experimentation is extremely dangerous. I mean, I don't know. Let me put it this way: I wasn't harmed. I haven't been harmed in ten years of dealing with this. Nor do I know anyone of my personal acquaintance who's had the experience who has been. However, I have been psychologically challenged. I have been physically roughed up at times. I do know of many cases of people who have had even tougher times than I've had. And initially, as you know from Communion my experience was really a rough one.

However, I do want to say another thing. That is that I got 140,000 letters. Not a whole lot of those letters describe difficult experiences. That was a rather rare aspect of it, to my great surprise. The reason I think that UFO researchers are so fixated on the negative side of it is because they are dealing with a self- selected sample of people all of whom have had tough times. And if people encounter something like this, and it's not hard on them, their tendencey is to just file it in the "Unknown" file of their lives, and perhaps do a little bit of quiet study or talk to friends about it. And to be curious and puzzled. But if they have a hard time, then they cry out for help. The result is that the UFO community gets one hundred percent people crying out for help. But when the broad, general population was so-to-speak "polled" by this book that had wide acceptance, it turned out that the ones who had problems were pretty rare compared to the ones who were just confused and puzzled at what was happening to them.

Question: The alien who sort of moved in and helped supervise your meditation and whom you basically felt was very pleasant is a fascinating model of human/alien integration. Do you have any new thoughts on this episode?

Strieber: Well, is it alien, or is it not alien? You use the word alien. I don't know if that's the right word to describe this.

Question: Well, I'll say Visitor then.

Strieber: No, I don't know what they are. I really must say that where I am right now is-I know they're real. I think I can prove that they're real reasonably to a reasonable person. At least to one who has some personal evidence and some sightings and so forth to support this. I don't know what they are. I have no idea if they're aliens or not. They've never said anything about what they are to me, and I have not got the faintest idea. Now, that's said. I meditate a lot.

It's inevitable that anybody who's interested in me, or trying to have a relationship with me, is going to get involved in the issue of meditation because that's a very central part of my life. Whether the Visitors got involved because they also are interested in this, or whether they got involved simply because it was something I did a lot I don't really know. But I do know this: they provided then and they provide now a very, very useful experience in meditation. Fifteen seconds with the Visitors can be like 15 hours of regular meditation. There have been some remarkable experiences that I would connect with them in regard to this. And they've been very valuable. I don't deny it. But, once again, whether this is something that is mutual or simply an opportunistic effort on their part to deepen the relationship, I don't know. But they obviously have been trying to deepen the relationship. That seems clear enough.

Question: Well, it seems from reading Breakthrough that a gray moved in for about three months.

Strieber: Oh, longer than that. I mean, that was only when I wrote the book. They've been around here a lot. We've had experiences here-I'd say they've been here physically in the past month two or three times. The most recent one, I regard it as an extraordinary experience because it was initiated when I was still wide awake, as is often the case now. And I felt something touching me, touching my leg, and I looked down, and there was what I would regard as someone standing at the foot of the bed who was shy. And it backed off into the dark, out of the glow of the light from the alarm system. And I was not surprised.

It's something that I've seen that's happened there many times. And the alarm system had not gone off, so I wasn't particularly scared. The next thing I knew, it touched my leg again. And I felt a feeling of repulsion. I didn't want this touching to take place. I moved my leg away. Whereupon it grabbed my leg and I could not look at it. It was one of these ephemeral little gray beings, and I could not look at it. I closed my eyes, and I felt a combination of repulsion and a different feeling, a much more positive feeling. I wouldn't describe it exactly as love, but it was certainly in the direction of an acceptance. And I had the interesting impression that the repulsion went two ways, that it was as difficult for him to be there as it was for me. There was no fear connected with this experience at all. Then the cat woke up and hissed, and the little creature ran away.

The old cat Sadie liked them a lot. She was very comfortable with them. But our young male cat Coe doesn't want anything to do with them. When I go into the room where they come a lot and meditate, he will come in and yowl at me unless I close the door. He does not even like me in there. This is a cat who's not buying this at all. Not like the other cat.

Question: In the book you say that you've developed a certain amount of trust that the aliens won't harm you when an experience is happening.

Strieber: Well, that's been my experience for ten years, yeah.

Question: What do you feel is the real balance in your case of trust versus fear?

Strieber: Well, it's not a question of trust versus fear. I'm prudent-I'm not going to push this. I will go into that room and meditate now, but I think that it will be awhile before I go out in the woods again. Because they're getting very close to me. And I don't want to create the impression that I'm entirely comfortable with them, because I'm not. What I want to do is to keep this at a point where we have a close but not completely intermingled relationship. In other words, I don't feel I would necessarily be able to handle it if they were right on top of me all the time. It's one thing for them to show up for a few seconds or a few minutes once or twice a month, and another thing entirely for me to live inside their version of reality forever. I'm not so sure I'm ready for that.

Question: Sometimes I get the impression reading your book that the way the Visitors respond to you somehow indicates that your're hurting their feelings inadvertently. Do you think that kind of sensitivity is real? Do you feel like they're responding at times out of an unrequited love for you as a mortal?

Strieber: There's a very big feeling of unrequited love in my experience. And there's often the impression that they feel rejected by me. In a sense, that's one of the things that spurs me on and keeps me trying to make the relationship work on terms that are acceptable to me as a person, because it does seem that it's a relationship that needs to be solved. And that there's somebody on the other side that very much longs for it to be solved. However I would hasten to add that I'm not so sure that it's that easy to tell the difference between a lover and a predator from my standpoint. In the sense that a lion who has been eluded by a tender young deer is going to act just as miserable and unrequited as a lover. So, I'm real careful about that. They can be as unrequited as they want to, but I'm still not going to run after them or go head over heels over them.

Question: Your own experiences and the experiences of a great many of your letter writers differ a great deal from the standard abduction scenario.

Steieber: Yeah, I was very amazed by that because the standard abduction scenario simply didn't come up. It wasn't something that people reported. I don't know whether it means that it's an artifact of hypnosis or it's a real thing or exactly what to make of that. But they certianly didn't report it to me in any numbers at all. I got a few letters that I followed up on, because I was interested to see what the people that reported that had to say about it, and as often as not they turned out to already be in UFO groups or abductee groups. So, I don't know what to make of that. I'm not a scientific professional, and it would take a lot of scientific work to figure that out.

What I do know is this: the letters I got are a message. They are a deposit from a lot of people who had experiences, who thought they had experiences, or were writing letters in fulfillment of their wish to have an experience. Some were probably hoaxes. Most of them obviously were not hoaxes. I mean, these letters are from ordinary people who've had extraordinary experiences. They scream that when you read them. You can tell the hoaxes. They were easy to spot, generally. But I didn't really worry about that because I wasn't trying to study the letters as "cases." I was simply collecting them kind of passively. Maybe later in the future they will be studied as cases, but I have not got the resources to do that, and I didn't try.

The difference between the letters and what the UFO community is reporting is very striking. I would say that what's happened is the UFO community has gotten, by no fault of its own, ahold of only the people who have trouble. And the people who have trouble with it are not really very much like the average experiences. I think they're all quite different.

Question: Like they're a harder case or something?

Strieber: No, I don't mean that. I think that if this is really alien contact, and I think it probably is, then obviously they make mistakes. They come on too strong to people sometimes. I think there may be different ideologies of contact among them, and some of them are more "bullying" than others. I think some people are more sensitive than others because in the backgrounds of their lives they've had negative experiences of various kinds that have kind of dovetailed with this in a very bad way. And they've ended up coming to psychologists and to psychiatrists and to UFO researchers for help.

I don't think that many of the abductee researchers have ever seen anybody except a person who needs help. I just don't think they get exposed to the average experience at all. And it varies tremendously in terms of its content. This attempts, I think, to present the picture of a standard, regular experience as if there were sort of "alien scientists" here sampling the population (which) probably does not reflect reality. Because there's an enormous variety of things that have happened to people which suggests that whatever is here is extremely complicated and has many, many different faces to present.

Question: Given the ideal scenario, what benefit would you and other abductees gain from ending the government cover-up? How would public ackowledgement of the UFO phenomenon help you and others in your situation?

Strieber: First of all, the government cover-up and the policy of secrecy dovetails. So, when we talk about the government, I don't think we can meaningfully talk about a government cover-up without also talking about the Visitors and their own policy of secrecy. They come at night. They hide. They're incredibly secretive. I think that the cover-up is loose compared to the level of secrecy that they themselves maintain. And I suspect that the cover-up is simply an outgrowth of their own desire for secrecy. So, the cover-up will end when they themselves are ready for the secrecy to end. And that will be when they feel that they can gain a meaningful relationship with us on terms that are acceptable to both sides. However, that's "their" interpretation.

It has to also be, as far as I'm concerned, that this relationship be acceptable to us on our terms. In other words, their interpretation of our terms and our real terms may be two different things. We have to find that out. I don't want a long-term relationship with them unless it's good for humanity. I don't want it to always be the kind of battle it's been. I think that we could kind of "get married," us and the Visitors. But I think it's something that we need to continue to explore very tentatively for awhile. I'm not really very interested in the government cover-up. I deal with it a little bit because it deals with me. But it's a small thing in comparison to the very large number of direct contacts that the Visitors have had. They've gone around the official community completely and directly to the people all over the world. So, that's the relationship that matters, not what the government may or may not know.

Question: In Dr. John Mack's book, Abduction, one of his cases says that he is told that an alien female has been chosen to be his bride or something. He looks at some kind of spidery-looking gray and is told that this is his intended mate.

Strieber: Yeah, I've got a number of people who have reacted to that sort of thing along the lines of "I don't want to marry a bug." (Laughter.) I don't know what all of that's about. I think that we're dealing with something that has a very, very different approach to reality than we do. And is at least as intelligent as we are. And it's going to be a long hard time. It's going to take more than one generation to get to the point where the relationship works. It doesn't work now. It's a dysfunctinal relationship at the moment. There's enough mutual interest and love at times that it's worth pursuing. They're certainly trying. I think that ultimately while I don't really address the issue of what they may or may not want to get out of it because I have no way of knowing that, ultimately we do have to understand that fairly clearly.

The reason is that among the people who have been hypnotized, there's a lot of stuff about sperm and eggs being stolen and kind of kinky sex stuff and so forth. And we've got to figure out what that's about before we really go into this too deeply. Do we really want to give up part of the human spirit to this without knowing what we're getting into? I don't think so. I don't. And if that is being taken from us, I have a tremendous problem with it. If it's being asked of us, then that's a different story. We build a relationship, and then if we gradually decide that would be a thing worth doing, then fine, let's do it, if it can be done. But if it's taken, then I'm sorry, it's not for me. I don't think that those stories are real stories, I have to tell you. Because you would think that if they were real stories, my letters would have been full of that sort of thing. They weren't. I mean, it got to the point where in order to hear a story like that, you really have to delve into the UFO community's books. Then when I read Mack's book, I thought God, every single person that he dealt with had it happen this way. I wonder what it could be about. It's almost like there might be one little group of Visitors that's doing this to people, and that group of people are very upset and they're looking for help, but the great majority of people from all over the world-I've gotten letters from virtually every country in the world-they never mention anything like having eggs or sperm stolen from them or being raped by aliens or anything. It simply isn't like that.

Question: Is there anything you wish to add?

Strieber: Yeah. I don't want the UFO community to jump to the conclusion that my book is all "sweetness and light" without reading it. My book takes a very even-handed approach. The worst stories I got, actually, are in the book. From anyone anywhere in the world. And they're pretty terrible. But what the book is really designed to do is to offer the proof which is there, to offer the witness statements to reveal what I found out about what the Visitors are doing, for what that's worth and to show what kind of relationship I built with them. And to suggest that we can do something with them. Something worthwhile. I think we can. But I am not suggesting that we stumble over our own feet in the rush to dive into this relationship. Because that's not going to work. That wouldn't be appropriate, and that's not what I've tried to communicate in Breakthrough.


So, Whitley Strieber struggles on with his heroic efforts to come to grips with what he himself never fails to call a "complicated" experience that eludes standard notions of black and white or good versus evil. His effort now is not just to endure his own abuction experiences but also to forge a meaningful relationship between himself and the Visitors who come to him in the night. Like all pioneers in human history, Whitley Strieber has ventured out beyond the known borders of human experience and has helped lead us all to the frontiers of something we should most eagerly wish to explore with him.

C.D.B. Bryan of "Close Encounters Of The Fourth Kind"

By Sean Casteel

C.D.B. Bryan is a journalist and author of the 1976 bestseller Friendly Fire, a gritty, brutally honest look at the impact the Viet Nam War had on this country. He has also been published in "The New York Times Magazine," "The New Republic," "The New Yorker," and most of the other leading magazines, and has earned the kind of reputation as a journalist that demands he be taken seriously.

Bryan recently came out with a new book called Close Encounters Of The Fourth Kind: Alien Abductions, UFOs, And The Conference At M.I.T. (Alfred A. Knopf, 1995) in which he reports on the 1992 scientific conference held at The Massachusetts Institute Of Technology in order to examine "the findings of various investigators studying people who report experiences of abductions by aliens, and the related issues of the phenomenon." The five day conference was chaired by M.I.T. Professor of Physics David Pritchard and Harvard Professor of Psychiatry John Mack. As one of the few members of the media invited to attend, Bryan was intrigued enough by what he saw and heard to investigate the subject in book-length form in an attempt to answer the question: If what these abductees are saying is happening to them isn't happening, what is?

I spoke to C.D.B. Bryan by phone from his home in Connecticut, and asked how he felt his book had been received so far.

"Well, I haven't had any responses from the reading public," Bryan said, "but I have heard from people in the field who said my book was the kind of book that John Mack should have written. You know, that it was an objective look at the phenomenon from somebody outside. I think John Mack is disappointed that I didn't come out and say that I believed that these people are being abducted by aliens in UFOs. And I'm not sure that they are. But what I do think is that something is going on here, and that just to disregard it out of hand because the subject is unpopular or associated with flakey people is a mistake."

Bryan admitted that tackling the subject of UFO abduction entailed a certain amount of risk, especially for a professional journalist like himself.

"You write about this subject," he said, "and you can get tarred with the same brush that tars the contactees. But I don't give a damn about that, you know? I'm going to be sixty next year, and I've been writing and supporting myself as a writer for thirty-five years. And critics come and go, but I'm still here."

"What I care about," Bryan continued, "is that here is a subject that is really interesting. And one of the luxuries of being a free-lance writer is that you can follow your curiosity. Were some of these abductees off the wall? Sure, some of them were. But not enough of them to disregard the phenomenon. And if it's real, if it's true, then it's a hell of a lot bigger story than Bosnia and O.J. Simpson."

Bryan said that some of the articles written about his Close Encounters Of The Fourth Kind have asked the question "Why is a journalist with his reasonably good credentials risking all of that to do this book?"

"Well, I'm risking it," Bryan explained, "because I think the subject is compelling and I think something's going on. And I don't have any idea what it is, but I'm certainly not going to laugh at people like Mack and Pritchard who take such risks. Nor am I going to laugh at the abductees who are in such obvious pain."

Bryan said that he had learned that often an abductee wants very much to be told he's crazy. "John Mack had a wonderful story," Bryan said, "about a University administrator telling him the story of his abduction. And Mack is listening to this guy and sees the guy is getting increasingly upset and finally Mack asks 'What's the matter?' And the guy says, 'You're not telling me I'm crazy.' You see, if you're crazy you can take Prozac or go see a shrink. But if this stuff is going on--and here is where Mufon and John Mack and Budd Hopkins and all of us who have looked into this have trouble--it's fascinating, but if it's real, then what the hell is going on? I mean, that's truly terrifying."

Bryan said that, while he has grown more skeptical about the truth of alien abductions since putting some time and distance between himself and the book, he still cannot explain away everything he learned while working on it.

"The five key dimensions that John Mack talks about," Bryan said. "The repeated, consistent details, the absence of any diagnosed mental illness, the physical changes, the association with UFOs, reports by children. Nothing I can come up with, and believe me I've looked, fits all the basic dimensions of the abduction phenomenon better than exactly what the abductees are saying."

At the M.I.T. conference, Bryan spoke to Robert Bigelow, the Las Vegas entrepreneur who was one of the backers of the conference and the Roper Poll on "Unusual Personal Experiences" designed by Mack, Hopkins, and David Jacobs.

"When I asked Bigelow what he thought was going on," Bryan recalled, "he said, 'Either it's a new psychiatric phenomenon, or it's real.' And what's interesting is that nobody has come up with the psychiatric illness that corresponds with what these people are seeing. And I think by now several thousand, or certainly several hundred conservatively, have been given very detailed psychiatric examinations--you know, tests like the Minnesota Multi-Phasic Personality Inventory, and they don't seem to be off the scale."

Of the many explanations offered for the alien abduction phenomenon, Bryan said, "My own favorite is 'The Overlapping Realities,' where we have frogs who can only see shades of gray, and we think we're superior beings because we see colors. We may be frogs to whoever these beings are. Because I don't think it's extraterrestrial, by the laws of physics and whatnot. I think if they're here, they're here."

So, a journalist from the mainstream enters the study of alien abductions from sheer curiosity and sees enough hints of the truth and enough fascinating, tantalizing possibilities to stay curious.

As Bryan said in Close Encounters Of The Fourth Kind, "If the conference, and my subsequent interviews and discussions with its participants and investigators, failed to provide me with 'clear and convincing evidence' that these abductees experienced extraterrestrial visitation, I did come away a believer in the sincerity and merit of their quest."



Q. and A. With Christopher O’Brien, Author of The Mysterious Valley

By Sean Casteel

When Christopher O’Brien made the fateful decision to move to the Crestone-Baca section of the San Luis Valley in Colorado seven years ago, little did he realize he was stepping into a kind of "Twilight Zone" where paranormal activities of all kinds happen almost constantly. UFO sightings, Unusual Animal Deaths (O’Brien’s preferred term for cattle mutilations), and a secretive military presence are a nearly daily part of the landscape in the remote section of the Southwest O’Brien writes about in his book The Mysterious Valley (St. Martin’s Press, 1996). The book chronicles both his research into the experiences of numerous local residents as well as his own personal experiences with anomalous lights and strange bedroom visitors.

We spoke to O’Brien by phone from his home in "The Mysterious Valley," and he talked about not only what is happening there in the San Luis Valley, but also shared his own theories as to why it is happening.

Q. Can you give us a brief account of how you came to live in the San Luis Valley and then began your research there?

O’Brien: Well, I’d known about the San Luis Valley because of the "Snippy the Horse" case back in ’67. I grew up in Washington State and right out of high school in ’75 I moved to New York City where I lived for 12 years. And then I spent two years in Boston. It’s really pretty simple. I was out on a fossil hunting trip in Utah. I drove out from Boston. And on the way back, I had a couple of friends who had just bought a lot here and they suggested that I stop by and visit. Which I did. I spent a day here and really liked it but I felt the area was a little bit remote for me having come from a big city. And three months later, I decided to move out to Santa Fe, and immediately didn’t like my choice. And after three days of being there, I moved out here. And here I am, seven years later.

Q. Okay, so that explains your move. How did you begin your research?

O’Brien: Well, like I said, I did have a little bit of knowledge about the history of the area, you know, past activity. But I figured pretty much it had all ended and it was all things from the past. I had a New Years Eve party on December 31, 1992 and I was kind of surprised to hear people talking about UFO sightings they’d had. And a couple or three different groups of people in the house were talking about them. So, I interviewed them all separately and brought them together. And some of them didn’t know that others had shared their experience. Then I asked them if they’d ever seen these lights before, and one of them said "The night before Thanksgiving," and another friend of mine said, "That’s when they discovered a mutilated cow down in Costilla County." Ever since then, I’ve been devoting as much time as possible to chasing down reports of this kind.

Q. So, you conducted hundreds of interviews and then attempted to verify all the accounts you heard. Can you tell us about some of the more significant events you document in the book?

O’Brien: Well, the NORAD phone call to the Rio Grande County Sheriff is probably the one that stands head and shoulders above the rest. Since it’s very, very rare for our Space Command, operators at Buckley and NORAD to call a local sheriff and report something as unusual as a few-acre size fire, and then to have the corroborating witnesses to a large formation of objects that flew into the Valley that day--I find that to be the most intriguing case that I personally have investigated. But again there have been some others. The unusual calf death over in Del Norte in the first week of March ’94 was also a very riveting case. That’s the one animal death that literally gave me the creeps and kind of made my hair stand on end. Those two sort of spring to mind. Obviously, my own sightings, because I personally experienced them, they also kind of impressed me. But it’s real difficult, other than those three examples, it’s real difficult to differentiate between all the dozens and dozens of other cases and reports that I’ve investigated. They’re all equally riveting in their own right, and they all I think have relevance. Especially the multiple-witness events where obviously you have a group of people. It’s very interesting to see how large groups of people respond to something unusual. And those particular sightings do stand head and shoulders above a lot of the others because of the amount of people involved.

Q. So, there’s obviously an endless flow of UFO sightings, Unusual Animal Deaths and helicopter sightings going on there in the San Luis Valley.

O’Brien: Well, it ebbs and flows. There’s no real rhyme or reason for the timing. When things are poppin’ around here, it does get pretty intense. I get numerous calls in a week. And then I can go months without one or with just one or two. If this stuff was all misidentified scavenger action or misidentified planets or whatever, you’d think you’d always have a trickle of reports. It would never really end. You’d always have something coming in. And that’s not the case. We can go weeks without a single call or report. And that to me kind of gives the indication that "Hey, maybe there’s something to this." Because when things are poppin’ around here, it’s amazing how many sightings and witnesses come out of the woodwork. And you’d think that there would be at least a constant trickle of reports if this was all just chalked up to people misidentifying things.

Q. I know you say there are many theories as to why these events are happening. Can you give us an overview of some of these explanations? As well as what you personally feel is the most likely cause of these events?

O’Brien: Well, in this country especially, there tends to be a real leaning towards the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. Based on a lot of the work that’s been done by people like Linda Moulton-Howe and others, there does seem to be a body of evidence that supports the conclusion that we are being visited by non-human entities from off-planet. You don’t see this particular hypothesis, however, being as popular in other parts of the world, like South America and Europe and Asia. There tends to be a whole kind of drifting away from that and more skepticism for that hypothesis when you get out of this country. For instance, the animal deaths. There’s quite a bit of evidence to suggest that the military’s involved. We have well over 250 documented cases of military-style helicopters buzzing around mutilation sights either before, during, or after. The sightings during one of these experiments are pretty rare. However, there’s quite a number of reports of helicopters especially afterwards, checking particular sites or areas out. And that would be an indication to me that if it’s not the military, then they sure have an interest in it.

There’s all kinds of theories as to why these cows are being taken in this manner and being cut up. David Perkins in the late 70s came up with the conclusion that a lot of these areas of high incidence are downwind and downstream of places where uranium is utilized. Whether it’s a uranium mine or an enrichment lab or a nuclear power plant or even missile silo areas. And he concluded that perhaps we’re seeing some kind of "environmental monitoring" going on where soft-tissue areas of cows are being taken and analzyed for environmental pollutants. Using that sort of theory, I’ve often wondered if the San Luis Valley, which is one of the most pristine areas in the continental United States, whether the cows here could be considered some kind of "control group."

Now, who’s doing these experiments? Who’s flying these ships? I have a hunch that quite a number of these aerial lights and craft that are reported here could actually be very terrestrial, very military and very secret. There’s a couple of theories that I’ve heard that when they moved a lot of the more esoteric equipment out of Area 51 in the mid- to late-80s, that some of them moved here. And it’s very difficult to imagine our government having the technology to fly a mile-long ship. You know, a rectangular or triangular ship in the sky at very slow airspeed. But, who knows? If it’s not our government, then who the heck is it? There are other theories, too, that maybe this is some sort of "manifested psychism" from the collective unconscious. Maybe we as a culture are actually "creating" paranormal phenomena for some particular reason that’s unknown. A lot of these things have been reported for thousands of years. You know, "chariots of fire" and "wheels within wheels" and "flaming wheels in the sky" and gnomes and fairies and goblins and trolls and all these kinds of descriptions of the unknown that have been with us for hundreds of thousands of years. And yet how do we know that UFOs and unusual cattle deaths are nothing more than an extension into time to a high-tech aspect of these manifestations that we may as a culture or a species be responsible for. I mean, it could be travelers from time coming back to harvest cattle parts and then go back in time. We could be dealing with entities from the inner earth. John Keel came up with the idea of the "ultra-terrestrial," some sort of dimensional-type being that shares our space with us but on a different plane of existence or different level of existence. There’s so many theories, and there’s a lot of evidence to back each one of them up. However, there’s just as much if not more evidence to negate that particular theory, whatever it might be. So, I really think we need to broaden our approach as interested investigators and researchers into this realm. We need to broaden our approach and to look at things that peripherally have not been really scrutinized before by Ufologists or phenomenologists. In my book, I really do try to get into the Native American myths and traditions and get into the geology of the area. To look at every single aspect of the area and don’t discard anything. Collect all the information and take the San Luis Valley as a microcosm of the macro. And the hermetic axiom "As above, so below" should come into play. If I can figure some things out on the microcosmic level here in the San Luis Valley, it should overlay onto the macrocosm of the entire "big picture." And a lot of people are coming up with theories and running around collecting data to try to prove these theories and I’m not sure if that’s the most effective way that we can try to solve these last remaining mysteries.

Q. Very good. Well, some of the witnesses describe the helicopters as being as silent as alien ships. Does this somehow imply that the helicopter phenomenon might be an alien thing and not a human/military thing?

O’Brien: Well, again, I think it’s so multifarious and there’s so many different players involved here. There’s different agendas at work. I really feel that there is a possibility that helicopter images could somehow be used as a screen image or some sort of camouflage for something more high-tech and more strange. I’ve seen very interesting footage that Jose Escamillo and his family took near Midway in New Mexico of a helicopter flying along and then morphing right into a silver sphere or disk. And it would seem to me that if we are dealing with some sort of intelligent, non-human species of some kind--like, why do they light their ships up to begin with? Why do we see anomalous lights in the sky? They don’t need lights. They literally could travel with no running lights at all. And the fact that they do use lights means that at times they want to be seen. I think appearances are deceiving and, who knows? Maybe all these blinking red and white lights that fly over here--how do I know it’s an airliner unless I hear it? And the same goes with the helicopters. I had a postmaster go outside. His whole house was shaking. He went outside and just a few feet above him was a huge helicopter. Be he heard absolutely no motor sound. All he heard was the sound of the rotors whipping through the air in the down blast of the wind. That’s the only sound he heard. The thing took off, and it was mechanically silent although the rotors were making noise in the air. This guy is ex-military and a trained observer and you’d think that he would be able to differentiate between something normal and something "high strange" like that.

So, it’s really difficult to answer the question because the answer might hold true for one side of the question, whereas on the other side, it wouldn’t be true. So, who knows? I think a lot of these choppers are military. We have a low flight level Military Operations Area (MOA) here called the LeVido MOA and almost daily we see fighter planes and transport planes and helicopters flying around here. However, how do we know that some high-tech presence isn’t flying something alongside these conventional craft that looks conventional but in actuality isn’t? It’s very, very difficult. The more I get involved in this stuff, the more confusing it seems. And the less you really know. The less you can be sure of.

Q. In the section of the book where you discuss the links between Tibetan monks and Hopi Indians, you write "Some Hope elders predict that the U.S. will go to war abroad in the summer of 1996." What is your reaction to the fulfillment of that prophecy by our firing of missiles on Iraq?

O’Brien: Well, I’m not surprised. The Hopi, and Native Americans in general, for some reason I get a gut sense, my instinct tells me that they are somehow privy to prophecy-type information. I just get a sense that Native Americans, for some reason, do have some information that they’re not generally allowing to go out beyond their own subculture. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that Martin and Thomas’ vision of this summer is coming true. The troops in Bosnia, they’re sitting on a powder keg. The whole Middle East is just waiting for the wrong thing to happen at the right time. I think it was a pretty safe bet that any sort of prophecy like that would come true. (Laughter) But I think it is an indication that Native Americans are concerned about our planet and about other people on this planet. And that they are slowly opening up and trying to convey this concern to the world at large. And again I’m not surprised at all that it came true.

Q. Well, do you personally believe in prophecy, like Biblical prophecy or Nostradamus?

O’Brien: You know, that’s a good question. I think there’s got to be some sort of grain of truth to the idea of prophecy. Whether Nostradamus is correct versus Michael Scallion versus one of the little girls at Lourdes or Fatima, it’s real difficult to say. There’s a lot of people out there professing to be prophesying, and none of these prophecies have come true. I think part of the reason why prophecy exists in our culture is pretty simple. It’s to warn us about what it looks like we’re going towards and maybe try to change people just enough so that these prophecies don’t come true. I think prophecies are as much a warning as they are "reality-based information." I think it’s a lot of instinctual stuff. I don’t think it’s the voice of God speaking through a particular person. Maybe it was a few thousand years ago or something. I don’t know. But now I think it’s just people really "grokking" the flow of where things are going. Scallion is a good example of somebody who really has a handle on an aspect of our planet. He really does put a lot of emphasis on the earthquakes and the natural calamities that we see routinely on this planet. But I really do think there is something to prophecy but not to the extent that someone maybe a little more Fundamentalist would think.

Q. Well, having been witness to a lot of gory scenes involving mutilated cattle, do you still believe it’s possible that the aliens are a benevolent force with the good of mankind as part of their agenda? Can the cattle mutilation phenomenon have a basically good motivation behind it?

O’Brien: Well, that’s like asking me if someone who experiences stigmata, if that’s a positive or negative thing in their life. To give you an example, Padre Pelo, a very, very famous "near saint," if you will in the Christian Catholic religion, would manifest the wounds of the nails and the spear thrust into the side of the crucified Christ. Now, I would think that something like that would not necessarily be a positive thing. I mean, it would have to hurt, I would think, and be quite uncomfortable. But it’s attributed by the culture and the people who believe in the tradition, it’s considered a blessing, almost. The guy has to be in a state of grace in order to be holy enough or pious enough to exhibit these very flagrant paranormal wounds. So, it’s really difficult to be judgmental in this realm. I don’t think it’s positive and I don’t think it’s negative. I think we’re seeing a very methodical process that has some sort of experimentation going on. Maybe it’s being done to fight some major virus that we experience as a society in the future. It’s time travelers coming back and harvesting parts to try to save us in the future. If it’s that, it would be a very positive thing. If it’s nasty reptoids coming from some other galaxy harvesting parts to feed themselves or do weird genetic experiments that we don’t stand to gain from, then that would be a negative thing. There’s evidence to support either contention. I really try to keep my judgmental side out of it and not pass judgment on it saying that it’s one thing or another thing. There are other researchers and investigators out there who are convinced that this is a very negative thing and they do cite a body of evidence to support that. However, we don’t know. We really don’t know. We don’t have enough information to ascertain--I mean, obviously it’s pretty negative for the poor cow and for the rancher who’s out the money. But the agenda behind it, we don’t have enough information to even decide whether it’s benevolent or malevolent. And I don’t go out on a limb and say it’s one or the other. It’s very perplexing and it’s very mysterious. It does have a veneer of being malevolent, because it is probably one of the only "blood-based" phenomena that we have out here. "Blood-based" paranormal phenomena. A real cattle mutilation to me is a paranormal event.

However, just because it’s "blood-based" doesn’t necessarily mean it’s negative. And I’m not saying that these are all positive entities going around doing positive things to very unfortunate cattle, not by any stretch of the imagination. But I’m not willing to say it’s the other way either.

Q. Right. You discuss in the book about how the Lord’s Supper is "blood-based."

O’Brien: Well, the body of Christ is offered up in the Catholic mass. And there’s examples of blood in rituals all through the Western esoteric tradition as well as many of the other traditions on the planet. So, blood is something that we do have a tendency to use as some sort of spiritual elixir or element in a ritual. The cattle death phenomenon to me smacks of ritual. There’s something ritualistic about it. And what that is and why it is, I’m probably the last person you should ask.

Q. Okay. Well, your personal experiences with the paranormal began when you were a child. And you also talk about many of your own sightings and even a couple of visitations that happened to you there in the San Luis Valley.

O’Brien: Well, I’m not sure what they were. They could have been visitations. But they sure were weird. I had my little, kind of shadow things back last week for the first time in a year and a half. Which kind of shocked me. I wasn’t prepared for it. It’s not like something I see every day. When whatever it is is here, I know it. And I’m very sensitive to that. However, 99.9 percent of the time, they’re not here. So, I do have something to sort of base my judgment on.

Q. Well, talk about these shadow figures a little more.

O’Brien: Well, it’s difficult for me to really convey. They’re shadow-like, but some rippling energy is bouncing off the shadows. It’s very difficult to describe or to give a real accurate visual idea of what I experience. And it’s only been a handful of times. But I do get a sense of a group of energetic forms that come into the room. I’ve only experienced it when I’ve been in bed with the light off in my bedroom. The closest I’ve come to identifying any sort of shape or form was I could have sworn I saw a shoulder go by at one point. I feel a tingling sensation when they get very close to me. I’ve literally had what I thought was "them" or whatever it is within inches of my face, and my face starts to break out in a tingle. I don’t know if that’s a psychosomatic reaction to my perception or whether it’s a physical manifestation of something. I don’t know. When I was six and a half years old, I had an actual encounter or visitation by four or five of your typical gray little guys. But I can’t remember their eyes. They’re blanked out in my mind. But these entities followed me around in my neighborhood at three in the morning. And I have more than enough evidence from the experience to know that I wasn’t sleep-walking, I wasn’t dreaming, I was not feverish or in some sort of possibly hallucinatory state of any kind. That was a very, shall we say, "riveting" experience for a young kid. It took my sister a while to find me. When a neighbor called and said "Your little boy’s pounding on our door and seems really frightened," it took a bit of time for her to locate me. And I wasn’t where I should have been. I was three houses away. So, something may or may not have occurred. I’ve never actually gone and had any sort of hypno-regression. I guess I’ll save that for the second or third book. (Laughter)

Q. Well, do you ever feel you were "chosen" or predestined to be part of the San Luis Valley events? And to write, lecture, and appear on radio and television as part of a larger plan to help make the reality of the aliens apparent to the general population?

O’Brien: I’ve entertained the thought, and I’ve "what-ifed" to myself more than a few times about that. I choose not to buy into that particular scenario simply because I do exercise my true will and my free will. And if my true and free will is involved in some sort of agenda, I don’t know it consciously. Whether I was "chosen" or predestined, it’s very difficult for me to say. I mean, if you had asked me five years ago what I’d be doing now, the last thing I would have said would be being on television and writing a book about all this stuff. So, a certain aspect of it does kind of make me wonder, let’s put it that way. I mean, I felt compelled to do what I did, but whether that was anything beyond my own personal compulsion, I don’t really know. I can’t really say, because, consciously, it doesn’t appear that way.

Q. Well, the Crestone-Baca area in the San Luis Valley has become a "New Age Mecca" and is also described as a "doorway between dimensions" kind of place. Would you care to discuss that perception of the area and to give us an overview of some of the folklore and myths associated with it? I’m very interested in that aspect, the local folklore.

O’Brien: Oh, so am I. In fact, I think it’s intrinsic to any sort of evaluation or examination of any area. You have to look at the folklore and the historic traditions that exist in the subculture. And what’s interesting about this area is that it does have quite an exalted place in the traditions of many Native Americans. It’s one of the only areas on the whole continent where three major groups of Indians overlapped and shared a particular part of the geography. And this is the site of the most holy mountain in most Southwest Indian tribes’ tradition. It’s the Holy Mountain of the East "where all thought originates." To the Pueblo Indians, and some of the other local tribes, it’s considered "the place of emergence." Obviously, this information varies from tribe to tribe and from major Indian group to major Indian group. But we do have a tradition and an historic sort of indicator that this area is a sacred area. And, of course, when I arrived here, everybody was talking about "portals" and "dimensional doorways" and all these things. Whenever I asked them "How do you know that they’re here?" they’d just say, "Well, that’s what I’ve heard." So, one of my early motivations was to really try to dig into the perception by people here that this is a holy place where there are energetic properties that are unusual. These "doorways" and "portals," obviously, this was very intriguing. Sedona is another area that springs to mind that has a similar reputation. That was one of my driving compulsions--to figure out where did this information originate, why and is there any basis in fact? And as I found out, the area does have some highly unusual gravitational and aero-magnetic areas. And where the two minimum and maximum zones in a particular area, where they intersect tends to be the scene where a lot of our paranormal activities is reported.

So, my gut tells me that there is an inter-relatedness between the historic tradition and the possible geophysical energetic properties. There does seem to be an indication that there’s something to that.

And there are other areas. I’m not saying that we’re the center of the Ufological or paranormal universe here. Not by any stretch of the imagination. There are other areas scattered around the country that are as enigmatic, if not more so, in some cases. But it’s the combination of the unusual, geophysical properties with the tradition of sacredness by indigneous people and, for some reason, military activity. The military tends to grab areas that are around that sacred site or that geophysical energy. We do have the Military Operations Area here. So, whenever I see those three components or elements together in a geographic location, then I automatically assume that there’s weird stuff going on there and sure enough, most of your areas that do report a higher incidence of unusual activity or reports of that nature do tend to have those three elements there, based on my limited research as an amateur.

Q. Is there anything you wish to add? Is there any question I haven’t asked?

O’Brien: Well, it’s not my intention to scare people and it’s not my intention to "prove" to people that I know what I’m talking about or anything of that nature. It’s just looking at a microcosm of the macro and really examining it. You know, it’s a very difficult place to live and I’m really hoping that some of the fears of the locals here aren’t realized and that people flood into the area based on their newfound knowledge of the area. It’s extremely rigorous climate-wise and economically it’s one of the poorest areas in the country. So, you have to be either independently wealthy or really creative. And I’ve been accused by some local media on the front range of just trying to increase the tourist traffic here, which I find pretty funny when I hear that. Because, quite frankly, I’ve put myself out on a little bit of a limb by saying I live in this small little town and writing about it. You know, I have to deal with that, and for the last four years, I’ve had people come from other countries and people chase me down on job sites and gigs. And in the most unlikely situations, all of a sudden something pops up. "Hi, I’m from Missouri. Could you show me?" People expect me to drop everything I’m doing because they’re there. I guess I set myself up a little bit in that regard, but it’s something that I’m dealing with. I think most people do have a sense of respecting a person’s space. So, I’m hoping that I can remain here and continue living here. I’m working on a second book already. It’s going to be almost a continuation of the first book, but I’m going to look at some other mysteries that I didn’t get into in the first book. I’m going to dive a little deeper into the Native American information and into the underground bases that are supposed to be here. And about using hard science to do surveillance on some particular, very small, localized hot spots.

So, I’m having a lot of fun. I’ve gotten some of the historical stuff out of the way, which did kind of bog me down a little bit. I had to get into the "Snippy" case and the cattle mutilation wave in the 70s. And now that I’ve covered all that ground, it gives me a little more leeway and I can go in depth in some of the other more enigmatic things here. The treasure legends. We’ve got Spanish treasure maps and multigenerational families that are looking for lost treasure. There’s a lot of interesting stuff here, and I just scratched the surface with the first book.

THE END

Take me back to The Beginning of Sean Casteel's Page

Take me to The Phantom Bookshop Main Page

Website maintained by John Anthony Miller of Phantom Bookshop, Ventura, CA. Thank you for visiting Sean Casteel's UFO Page. Text content is copyright by the authors. If you intend to use any material for publication, we would like to be notified before use. Thank you.